![]() I have made those presets for my Sony A7, but they give good results with Canon 5D and Olympus XZ-1 RAW files.ĭon’t hesitate to modify and re-upload them if you think you can make them better. Desaturation for Acros and Monochrome, disabled for the others. I used RawTherapee for awhile because it was powerful and free. Theres a free Film Simulation pack available for RawTherapee that works straight away (google it, youll find the download). Unfortunately, presets with custom tone curves will reset any exposure adjustment made prior to applying the preset. I dialed them back until I got the look I wanted, closer to portrait color negative films, and created my own presets.
If you give Lightroom a try (theres a generous 30-day free trial, full featured), you may decide its worth buying.I have used a different approach from the one arangast used for the presets he recently posted. ![]() Most of my pictures won’t need any more post processing except maybe for some exposure and white balance adjustments. The goal with these presets is to be able to apply them to any picture and be done with it. Here are 8 presets inspired by the current 8 Fuji film simulation modes (only counting the two main B&W modes and not their derivatives). Processing profile is a text file which contain all of the tool settings which RawTherapee applies to the associated photo. The RAW file opens first in Darktable, where you can make basic edits. From there, the process is similar to RawTherapee. Like Adobe software, GIMP and Darktable talk to each other. Next, navigate to the RAW file you want to open. However, instead of preset, the feature is called processing profile. Then go to the File drop-down menu and select File > Open (Ctrl or Command+E). ![]() RawTherapee also has a feature to allow you saving the adjustments you made. Anyway, after a lot of hard work, I’ve managed to make some presets that satisfy me needs and tastes. Presets are aimed at recurring use with the purpose of saving you time. RawTherapee looks like a really complete and powerful RAW processor, but it’s IMO much harder to get good results quickly and I personally don’t like the default preset with it’s auto exposure. It’s a good program, but I really dislike Adobe and as a user of FOSS software, I really wanted to use a native Linux FOSS RAW processor. First, a little introduction: For the last 6 years, I’ve used Lightroom. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |